منابع مشابه
Different answers to different questions
⁎ Corresponding author. Postbus 9104 6500 HE, Nijm E-mail address: [email protected] (G.J.M http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2014.02.003 0163-8343/© 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Article history: Received 14 June 2013 Revised 15 January 2014 Accepted 5 February 2014
متن کاملWhat’s Different, Ethically, About Nanotechnology?: Foundational Questions and Answers
Whether nanotechnology is ethically unique and “nanoethics” should be treated as a field in its own right remain important, contested issues. This essay seeks to contribute to the debates on these issues by exploring several foundational questions about the relationship of ethics and nanotechnology. Ethical issues related to nanotechnology exist and adoption of a defeasible presumption that suc...
متن کاملDifferent answers to different questions: exploring clinical decision making by general practitioners and psychiatrists about depressed patients.
PURPOSE Exploring three perspectives on differences between general practitioners (GP) and psychiatrists in clinical decision making about depressed patients. The gold standard perspective focuses on differences in decisions (output) as a result of lack of expertise, the input perspective relates differences to different information use and to other roles, and the throughput perspective attribu...
متن کاملDifferent Structures for Evaluating Answers to Complex Questions: Pyramids Won't Topple, and Neither Will Human Assessors
The idea of “nugget pyramids” has recently been introduced as a refinement to the nugget-based methodology used to evaluate answers to complex questions in the TREC QA tracks. This paper examines data from the 2006 evaluation, the first large-scale deployment of the nugget pyramids scheme. We show that this method of combining judgments of nugget importance from multiple assessors increases the...
متن کاملEvaluating Answers to Definition Questions
This paper describes an initial evaluation of systems that answer questions seeking definitions. The results suggest that humans agree sufficiently as to what the basic concepts that should be included in the definition of a particular subject are to permit the computation of concept recall. Computing concept precision is more problematic, however. Using the length in characters of a definition...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: General Hospital Psychiatry
سال: 2014
ISSN: 0163-8343
DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2014.02.003